Call for Proposals
HFES 49th Annual Meeting
September 26-30, 2005
Orlando, Florida USA
The online submission site is now closed.
Contents
2005 Deadlines
General Information
Step-by-Step Instructions
Practice-Oriented and Student Work
Descriptions and Materials to Submit for Each Presentation
Type
HFES Technical Groups
Program Chair Information
| Proposals (all presentation types) due
|
February 8
|
| Accept/reject letters sent
|
March 28
|
| Proceedings Author Kits sent
|
April 22
|
| Workshop preliminary handouts due
|
April 15
|
| Workshop final acceptances sent
|
May 16
|
| Proceedings papers due
|
June 13 |
The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting provides an opportunity
for the exchange of information and ideas among people working in the field of
human factors/ergonomics and related areas. The 49th Annual Meeting offers
opportunities for participants to submit creative proposals for program
materials of all kinds. Although traditional lecture and panel sessions will be
the core of the program, innovative formats are especially welcome. The meeting
will take place at the Royal Pacific Resort at Universal Orlando in Orlando,
Florida.
New formats for presenting human factors/ergonomics (HF/E) efforts are strongly
encouraged. Participants are invited to submit proposals including case
studies, debates, demonstrations, competitive product designs, videotapes, new
methodologies, on-site experiments, and posters.
HFES particularly welcomes submissions from professionals in related fields.
View the descriptions of HFES Technical Groups to determine if there is a match
between your work and the interest areas of human factors/ergonomics
researchers and practitioners. The Society may waive the one-day registration
fee for allied professionals who attend the meeting just to present their work.
Note that proposals for all presentation types (e.g., lectures, posters,
demonstrations) are due on the same date, FEBRUARY 8. Accepted authors will be
asked to prepare a proceedings paper of one to five pages (see also details
about Publication Requirements below).
Proposals cannot be submitted to the on-line system after midnight on February
8. Don't wait until the last minute to submit. If you encounter problems (e.g.,
your proposal file size is too large), you may not have time to meet the
deadline.
Proposals that do not conform to the requirements described in this booklet or
that are sent to more than one program chair simultaneously will not be
reviewed. Note that for all accepted proposals, one of the authors must attend
the meeting to present the work. All presenters are required to pay the meeting
registration fee.
On-Line Submission and Review
All proposals will be submitted to the
HFES 2005 Submission Web site. You can also go to the
HFES site and click on the "HFES 49th Annual Meeting" link. Detailed
instructions appear on the following pages.
You must have e-mail access to have a proposal considered for the HFES Annual
Meeting. All communication with you about your proposal (e.g., confirmation of
receipt, acceptance/rejection notices) will be sent by the on-line submission
system via e-mail. The sender is "HFES2005@mirasmart.com." If you have
spam-blocking software or other filters running, please adjust your settings to
prevent interference with e-mail messages from HFES2005@mirasmart.com. In
addition, if your e-mail address changes during the review period, be sure to
log in and update it or notify HFES.
Papers that have been published previously or presented at another professional
meeting may not be submitted. Submission of your annual meeting proposal is
your representation to HFES that all coauthors have given their consent to
publish the paper. You must choose one
HFES Technical Group to which to send your proposal. If you have
questions about the suitability of your proposal for a technical group, contact
the appropriate program chair.
Content of Abstracts and Summaries
This section describes the submission requirements for technical proposals. Most
proposals require three elements: proposers' contact information, a 150-word
abstract, and a 2000-word summary.
Abstracts. In 150 words, address all the important points succinctly.
Technical Group newsletter editors and others use these abstracts in their
publications.
Summaries. The 2000-word summary is the key item that reviewers use in
their evaluations. It is a brief statement of all the major points you wish to
make. The on-line submission system enforces size limits for all types of
proposals; an error message will appear if you attempt to upload or cut and
paste more than these limits. If you submit substantially less than 2000 words,
the chair may reject your proposal.
Tables and figures. You may submit a small number (i.e., 1-4) of tables,
illustrations, and/or figures if they substantially clarify the method or
results.
Research Papers
Summaries of research papers should contain the following, as appropriate:
-
Introduction: General statement to orient the reader to the specific problem,
research strategy, and relevant publications. Providing lengthy introductions
and excluding other items can lead to rejection of the proposal.
-
Method: How the study was conducted, including participants, apparatus, and
procedure. State exactly what independent and dependent variables are included
in your research. Results: Summarize the data collected and the statistical
treatments and effects.
-
Discussion: Describe your inferences from the results and their implications.
-
References, tables, figures: Provide full references for all citations used in
this proposal. References are included in the total word count and should be
styled according to the latest edition of the American Psychological
Association
Publication Manual (5th ed.).
Practice-Oriented Papers
Although many papers accepted for the annual meeting describe results of
empirical research, papers that focus on the practice of human factors are
welcome. Examples might include:
-
Critical analyses of problem or technology-application areas
-
Summaries of advances in human factors processes, procedures, and tools and
methods of using them
-
Field studies
-
Critiques of existing research
-
"Lessons learned" discussions of human factors successes or failures
Practitioner papers should emphasize information that could be used readily by
other practitioners (e.g., new approaches, methods, strategies, or techniques),
not merely report on a project one has completed. The practice-oriented paper
requirements are slightly different from those for research proposals:
-
Introduction: General statement to orient the reader to the area of your study.
Avoid overly long introductions to the exclusion of other information.
-
Thesis: Exactly what your paper will demonstrate or explain. Sources of
information: How and where you have gathered relevant information, or a
detailed description of your idea, product, system, or concept.
-
Findings: A summary of the information you have gathered.
-
Discussion: Practical applications and implications drawn from the findings.
-
References, tables, figures: Provide full references for all citations used in
this proposal. References are included in the total word count and should be
styled according to the American Psychological Association
Publication Manual (5th ed.).
Review Process
Most program chairs prefer single-blind review, whereby the author does not know
the reviewer's identity unless the reviewer chooses to be identified. If you
would like your proposal to be double-blind reviewed (neither the reviewer nor
the author is identified), do not include your name or affiliation in your
abstract or summary. However, chairs have the discretion to include author
information when this is judged to be an important consideration in the review.
Approval Process
Do not submit your proposal unless you have received internal approval or
clearance from your employer, client, or sponsor. Be sure to obtain clearance
as soon as possible so you don't miss the February 8 deadline.
Commercialism
HFES reserves the right to reject or cancel presentations that inappropriately
promote a product or service. Questions about this policy may be directed to
Technical Program Committee Chair Barrett S.
Caldwell.
If your proposal is accepted, you will receive a kit describing how to prepare
your paper for publication in the Annual Meeting Proceedings. There is an
absolute five-page limit for proceedings papers; the page limit is strictly
enforced. Completed papers are due June 13, so, again, be sure to obtain
employer approval promptly. HFES reserves the right to cancel publication if
papers are received after June 13.
Papers accepted for publication in the proceedings must be accompanied by a
fully executed HFES Copyright Transfer Form bearing all coauthors' names and
signatures, as well as any required employer signatures. The form may be viewed
during the proposal submission process. If your employer uses an alternative
copyright transfer form, you must submit it to HFES for consideration prior to
or, at the latest, with the completed proposal. HFES will consider such forms
insofar as they are compatible with the Society's terms and policies. Send
alternative forms to Lois Smith at HFES,
P.O. Box 1369, Santa Monica, CA 90406-1369 USA; fax 310/394-2410.
Alphonse Chapanis Best Student Paper Award
This award provides a certificate and $1000 cash gift to the student or students
who conduct outstanding human factors research that is accepted for the annual
meeting, presented before the Chapanis Award Committee, and judged to be the
best student paper presented at the meeting. Students who wish to apply may
complete the application form included in the paper instruction kit.
Eligibility is contingent on all authors being students; joint authorship with
a faculty member makes the paper ineligible. The paper must be the result of
work accomplished while the student is enrolled in an appropriate curriculum.
If one or more of the authors of a paper has been a full Member of the Society
for one year or more, the paper is ineligible.
Some HFES
Technical Groups also offer best annual meeting paper awards. If you
are interested in having your accepted paper considered for one of these
awards, be sure to select "Student Work" in the on-line submission system when
uploading your proposal.
Requirements for All Submissions
Proposals must be uploaded to the
proposal submission Web site. When logging in, please use only one
e-mail address to identify yourself, no matter how many proposals you wish to
upload. Choose a password and record it somewhere for future use. If you forget
your password, you can request a reminder by clicking "Forget you password?" on
the main log-in page.
Before logging in to the site, (a) read all the information in the following
sections, (b) have your abstract and proposal ready on your desktop for
uploading, and (c) be ready to input the full contact information for all your
coauthors (full name with middle initial if required, mailing address, e-mail,
phone, fax). Simple instructions for entering information and uploading your
proposal are provided on each screen as you step through the submission
process, which takes about 10 minutes per proposal, depending on the
presentation type.
NOTE: At the end of the submission process, you must click the "Accept My
Proposal" button, which is available after you finish proofreading the file you
uploaded. If you do not get to the page with the "Accept My Proposal" button,
log back in with the same ID and password and complete the process. Contact
HFES if you have questions or problems.
When your submission has been successfully uploaded, you will receive an
automated e-mail confirming that you completed the process. If you do not get
this confirmation message but think you completed the submission, contact
HFES. The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society is not responsible for
incomplete submissions.
If you have multiple proposals, you will be prompted to enter them at the
conclusion of each submission. If you log out and reenter the site at a later
time to submit additional proposals, DO NOT create a new login ID and password
or enter the system using another e-mail address. Contact
HFES if you have problems.
Choosing Your Presentation Format
As you begin preparing your proposal for the annual meeting, carefully review
the descriptions of the various presentation formats included below, and select
the format that best matches the nature of the material you wish to present as
well as the objective(s) of your presentation. Please note that the
descriptions of the different presentation formats specify where the proposals
are submitted: Technical Group (TG), Special Sessions (SS), General Sessions
(GS), or Workshops (WK). Consult the “At-A-Glance” table below for
details about each presentation format (brief description, presentation length,
proceedings paper length, and where to submit proposals). Refer to the complete
description in the text for detailed information on each presentation format as
well as what material to submit with your proposal.
Please note that proposals must describe completed work. Proposals describing
work in progress will not be accepted. Authors of proposals accepted for
presentation at the annual meeting will be asked to prepare a paper to be
published in the proceedings according to the page limits specified in the
presentation format descriptions. Please note that there is no associated
proceedings publication for colloquia, alternative formats, or workshops.
Presentation Formats at a Glance
|
Presentation Format
|
Brief Description
|
Presentation Length
|
Proceedings Paper
|
Where to Submit
|
| Poster
|
Individual proposals describing recent empirical, theoretical, or design work
on significant human factors topics; emphasis on graphical display format and
one-on-one interaction with audience
|
- Two contiguous 90-minute sessions
- Presenters required to be at 2nd session
|
5 pages
|
TG/GS
|
| Lecture
|
Individual proposals describing recent empirical, theoretical, or design work
on significant human factors topics
|
- 90-minute session
- Maximum of five presentations at 16 minutes each
|
5 pages
|
TG/GS
|
| Symposium
|
Group of preselected lecture presentations describing recent empirical,
theoretical, or design work on a common topic
|
- 90-minute session
- Maximum of five presentations at 16 minutes each
|
2 page overview by chair; 5 page paper by each presenter
|
TG/GS
|
| Panel
|
Open, dynamic exchange of views among panelists and audience on a topic of
common interest; panels are not a series of lecture papers
|
- 90-minute session
- Maximum of six panelists at 5-10 minutes each
- 30 minutes discussion
|
5 page overview by chair
|
TG/GS
|
| Debate
|
Specifically intended to present opposing views on a common topic; audience
participation in questioning optional
|
- 90-minute session
- At least two debaters and a chair
|
5 page overview by chair
|
TG/GS
|
| Demonstration |
Intimate, interactive forum for acquainting audience members with new hardware,
software, research techniques, etc., through hands-on experience or a video
|
- 90-minute session
- Number of participants determined by organizer
|
5 pages
|
SS
|
| Colloquium
|
Opportunity for participants with different perspectives on some topic to
exchange ideas that will result in developing new knowledge; focus is on group
discussion of a topic, colloquia are not a series of lecture papers
|
- Half-day or full-day session
-Number of participants determined by organizer
|
NONE
|
SS
|
| Alternative Format
|
Primarily intended for proposals that do not fall under or are not suited for
the other predefined presentation formats (e.g., "Your 99 Seconds of Fame")
|
- 90-minute session
- Number of participants determined by organizer
|
NONE
|
SS
|
| Tutorial
|
Intended primarily to provide both professional development opportunities for
experienced professionals and "how-to" advice for those new to the profession
|
- 90-minute session
- Number of participants determined by organizer
|
5 pages
|
GS
|
| Workshop
|
Formal, structured sessions emphasizing hands-on, how-to learning activities;
designed to provide participants with usable applied skills. Requires
registration fee
|
- Half-day or full-day session
- Audience limited to 40 persons
|
NONE
|
WK
|
Technical Groups versus General Sessions
Authors considering poster, lecture, symposium, panel, or debate presentation
formats may submit their proposals to the Technical Group (TG) deemed most
appropriate for their proposed topic (see the
Technical Group descriptions), OR to General Sessions if the proposal
has clear applicability to multiple TGs or fall outside the existing TG
structure. Proposals submitted to General Sessions should encompass broad areas
of interest and integrate multiple perspectives. Past General Sessions topics
have included HF/E problem solving, field studies, systems analysis, and other
multidisciplinary topics. Additionally, new research areas emerge that do not
currently fit within the traditional TG makeup and best find homes in General
Sessions. For example, the Internet and Medical Systems TGs began life with
General Sessions papers in recent annual meetings.
Special interest groups within HFES (that is, groups with a topical area of
interest that have not yet qualified as an HFES technical group) may wish to
submit a session or group of sessions to General Sessions. These sessions
should be identified as coming from an organized special interest group, and
the name of the organizer of that group must be included in the submission.
Such sessions will be accorded slots in the program under the same criteria as
those applied to other General Sessions submissions.
How to Upload Your Proposal
1. Select ONLY ONE presentation type from the pull-down menu (see table above):
Alternative Format
Colloquium
Debate
Demonstration
Lecture
Panel
Poster
Symposium
Tutorial
Workshop
2. View the descriptions of topic coverage of the Society's 22
Technical Groups. Then select ONLY ONE of the following technical areas
for your paper from the pull-down menu. This automatically directs your
proposal to the program chair for that area. NOTE: Submitting the same proposal
to more than one group may result in automatic rejection of the work and
prohibition from presenting papers at future HFES Annual Meetings.
Aerospace Systems
Aging
Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Communications
Computer Systems
Education
Environmental Design
Forensics Professional
General Sessions
Health Care (formerly Medical Systems and Rehabilitation)
Human Performance Modeling (new group established in 2004)
Individual Differences in Performance
Industrial Ergonomics
Internet
Macroergonomics
Perception & Performance
Product Design (formerly Consumer Products)
Safety
Special Sessions
Surface Transportation
System Development
Test and Evaluation
Training
Virtual Environments
Workshops
If the program chair who receives your proposal feels it would fit better in
another technical area, he or she may redirect it to that group. You will
receive an automated message via e-mail should that occur.
3. Indicate a secondary technical area by selecting one item from the pull-down
menu. This will help the Technical Group program chairs avoid topic overlaps.
NOTE: Your proposal will be sent to the program chair of the group you selected
in the primary technical area, not the secondary area.
4. Select a Presentation Type (lecture, panel, symposium, etc.); see table
above.
5. Select either "Research Oriented" or "Practice Oriented."
6. Select either "Student Work" or "Nonstudent Work." This assists program
chairs and reviewers during the proposal evaluation stage. Accepted Student
Work proposals may be scheduled in the Student Forum track.
7. If your paper is part of a symposium, enter the five-digit Symposium Code,
which you will need to obtain from the organizer. Do not submit your proposal
until you have received this code.
8. The system automatically sends you a confirmation message by e-mail when your
proposal has been uploaded successfully. KEEP THIS FOR YOUR FILES. You may log
in to the system at any time to view the status of your proposal.
If any of your contact information changes during the review process, be sure to
log back into the on-line submission system and update your record. HFES is not
responsible in the event communication about your proposal fails to reach you
because of incorrect contact information in the on-line database.
Professional Development Sessions
In addition to the dissemination of technical information, HFES recognizes the
Society's role in the development of human factors/ergonomics professionals.
Topics for these sessions could include business issues such as finance and
accounting, small business law, contracts for consulting, government
regulations, government contracting, business and marketing plans, insurance
and risk (professional liability), and employee benefits. Corporate and
consulting topics such as managing a human factors team, using human factors
research in design, human factors project management, and effective consulting
practices are desirable. Topics related to the development of basic
professional skills such as computing, graphical displays, written
presentation, and oral presentation are also welcome.
Presenters should be capable of addressing issues from an experiential
perspective (lessons learned, tips, etc.). The sessions can take any format
(e.g., workshop, lecture, panel, debate; be sure to select the appropriate
Presentation Type in the pull-down menu). Presenters of workshops, which should
be tutorial in nature and emphasize hands-on or how-to learning, receive an
honorarium. Workshop presenters with relevant expertise but no extensive human
factors background, such as accountants and attorneys, may also submit
proposals.
When submitting your proposal, first select a Presentation Type (e.g., lecture,
panel) and then select the Technical Area that best represents your topic
(e.g., Forensics Professional). Finally, select "Practice Oriented." (Don't
forget to indicate whether the proposal represents Student or Nonstudent Work.)
Student Forum Sessions
HFES encourages proposals geared toward students. Past sessions include
presentations on skills for transitioning from school to work or to an HF/E
career from another field, employment trends in the HF/E field, and improving
interviewing and résumé-writing techniques. To submit a Student Forum proposal,
select "Student Forum" from the Technical Area pull-down menu.
Proposals of student work for a "Student Work Only" lecture session is also
welcome. Submission of completed work is desirable; however, work in progress
will also be accepted. The format of the session will be such that feedback on
work in progress can be freely given. There will be at least one student
reviewer for each submission.
When submitting your proposal, first select a Presentation Type (e.g., lecture,
panel), select the Technical Area that best represents your topic (e.g.,
Computer Systems), and then indicate if the proposal is research or practice
oriented. Finally, select "Student Work." Proposals that have been designated
"Student Work" may be scheduled in the Student Forum track.
Presentation format: POSTER
Description: Poster presentations are individual proposals that
describe recent empirical, theoretical, or design work on significant human
factors topics. In contrast to the traditional lecture paper, this format
offers presenters the unique opportunity to interact one-on-one with attendees
in an open, dynamic setting, and allows presenters to provide thoughtful,
in-depth responses to questions about their research to a broader audience.
Poster presenters are encouraged to make effective use of graphics as well as
text. NOTE: Posters are not alternatives to exhibits; therefore, commercial or
sales-oriented poster proposals will not be accepted.
Presentation length: Posters are on display for two contiguous
90-minute sessions, and presenters are required to be present during the second
session.
Proceedings paper: Presenters of accepted posters may publish a
proceedings paper of up to five pages.
Materials to submit: 150-word abstract and 2000-word summary
Where to submit: Appropriate Technical Group or General Sessions
Presentation format: LECTURE
Description: Lecture presentations are individual proposals that
describe recent empirical, theoretical, or design work on significant human
factors topics. Typically, individual proposals are grouped together by the TG
program chair based on the common topic area shared by the presentations.
Presentation length: Groups of not more than five lecture
presentations are combined into a single 90-minute session. On average, each
presenter is allotted 16 minutes to allow time for questions/answers.
Proceedings paper: Presenters of accepted lectures may publish a
proceedings paper of up to five pages.
Materials to submit: 150-word abstract and 2000-word summary
Where to submit: Appropriate Technical Group or General Sessions
Presentation format: SYMPOSIUM
Description: A symposium differs from a traditional lecture
session in that the session organizer selects the individual presentations a
priori and proposes them together as a group. Also, unlike a panel, which
features more discussion, a symposium places emphasis on separate
presentations, followed by questions from the audience. The chair of a
symposium may present an overview of the symposium that introduces the topic,
summarizes key points of each presentation and the relationships among them,
and draws conclusions based on the presentations. Alternately, the chair may
wish to invite a discussant to comment on and integrate the presentations. Each
presenter in a symposium gives a paper similar to a lecture presentation.
Symposium proposals should describe recent empirical, theoretical, or design
work on significant human factors topics. However, the symposium should present
a topic of sufficient scope and importance to allow diverse or conflicting
views on the topic. HFES discourages symposia in which a majority of the
participants come from a single organization. Exceptions may be made with the
concurrence of the appropriate TG program chair and the Technical Program
Committee chair.
Symposium proposals may be submitted by an organizer who does not intend to
serve a session chair and who appoints a session chair, or the organizer may
also serve as chair. The symposium organizer or chair should not also be a
presenter of a full paper in the session. The chair is responsible for
notifying participants of acceptance or rejection and providing participants
with copies of one another's abstracts and papers.
Presentation length: A symposium is allotted a 90-minute session
consisting of not more than five presentations, each lasting a maximum of 16
minutes, preceded or followed by a short summary by the symposium chair or
discussant.
Proceedings paper: Each presenter of a symposium paper may
publish a proceedings paper of up to five pages. Symposium chairs may publish a
symposium abstract of up to two pages.
Materials to submit: 150-word overview abstract describing the
symposium, 150-word abstract for each paper in the session, and 2000-word
summary for each paper in the session.
Symposium code: When the symposium organizer creates a new
symposium, the submission system will generate a five-digit code. All
presenters in the symposium session must use this code when they enter their
individual proposals. If you are the organizer, be sure to send your session
presenters the symposium code to ensure that their papers are reviewed as a
group.
Where to submit: Appropriate Technical Group or General Sessions
Presentation format: PANEL
Description: A panel differs from a symposium in that it involves more informal
discussion on a topic yet must be structured to offer a high degree of
interaction between the panelists and the audience. A panel provides a unique
opportunity for the dynamic exchange of views among panelists and members of
the audience on a topic of common interest. A panel is not a series of papers
as in a lecture session or a symposium.
HFES discourages panels in which a majority of the participants come from a
single organization. Exceptions may be made with the concurrence of the
appropriate TG program chair and the Technical Program Committee chair.
Panel proposals may be submitted by an organizer who does not intend to serve as
session chair and appoints a chair for the panel, or the organizer can also
serve as the session chair. The panel organizer or chair should not also be a
panelist in the session. The organizer of the panel serves as the contact
between the TG program chair and individual panelists. The panel organizer is
responsible for submitting the proposal, selecting a chair and cochair,
notifying panelists of acceptance or rejection, obtaining letters of agreement
to appear from each accepted panelist, and providing panelists with copies of
the panel abstracts and overview summary.
Presentation length: A panel is allotted a 90-minute session
consisting of not more than six panelists, each of whom should speak between 5
and 10 minutes (depending on the number of panelists), followed by an open
discussion period of at least 30 minutes. The panel chair is expected to
prepare questions to stimulate audience participation.
Proceedings paper: Panel chairs may publish a proceedings paper
of up to five pages. The paper should provide an overview of the issues to be
discussed by the panel and may include material provided by the panelists.
Individual panelists will not receive instructions for preparing a proceedings
paper.
Materials to submit: 2000-word panel summary and a 150-word
abstract for each panelist briefly describing what he or she will discuss
Where to submit: Appropriate Technical Group or General Sessions
Presentation format: DEBATE
Description: A debate differs from a panel in that it is intended
to present opposing views on a common topic. Debates may take either of two
forms: traditional, in which the chair serves only as a timekeeper; or
directed, in which the chair poses a series of questions, each of which is
debated in turn. The debate chair cannot also be a debater in the session.
Audience participation in the questioning is optional.
Presentation length: A debate is allotted a 90-minute session and
consists of, at a minimum, a chair and two debaters.
Proceedings paper: Debate chairs may publish a proceedings paper
of up to five pages. The paper should provide an overview of the issues to be
discussed during the debate and may include material provided by the
participants. Individual debaters will not receive instructions for preparing a
proceedings paper.
Materials to submit: 150-word abstract and 2000-word summary of
the debate describing its objectives and importance.
Where to submit: Appropriate Technical Group or General Sessions.
Presentation format: DEMONSTRATION
Description: Demonstrations provide an intimate, interactive
forum for acquainting audience members with new hardware, software, research
techniques, and so forth, often through hands-on experience or a video. Please
note that demonstrations are not alternatives to exhibits; therefore,
commercial or sales-oriented demonstration proposals will not be accepted.
Presenters will be provided with table space and an easel. Personal computers
(Macintosh or PC) will be provided on request. It is the presenter's
responsibility to supply alternative or additional equipment, if needed, and to
ascertain that the demonstration will work on the provided equipment.
Presentation length: Presenters will be scheduled to give their
demonstrations once during the meeting, typically for the duration of a
90-minute session, and may also use the demonstration area as available.
Proceedings paper: Presenters of demonstrations may publish a
proceedings paper of up to five pages.
Materials to submit: 150-word abstract, 2000-word summary
including objectives, description of subject matter, and possible applications.
By postal mail or courier, provide one set of supplemental materials, such as
photographs, diskettes, or videotapes, as appropriate, to assist in evaluation
of the demonstrations and its hardware requirements. These materials will be
returned after review on request.
Where to submit: Special Sessions
Presentation format: COLLOQUIUM
Description: Colloquia differ significantly from other
presentation formats in that they provide an opportunity for participants with
different perspectives on some topic to exchange ideas that will result in
developing new knowledge. In colloquia, the focus is on group discussion of a
topic rather than presentations of separate individuals' positions with
follow-up questions. Colloquia can serve as advanced collaborative learning
sessions or may be working sessions structured to achieve a better
understanding and consensus on a topic within the discipline.
The colloquium organizer primarily serves to facilitate discussion, help
establish and maintain a productive interaction, and ensure that everyone is
allowed to participate. The colloquium organizer is responsible for the
following:
-
Preparing a call for proposals describing the colloquium and the participant
selection process. The call should be widely disseminated through the HFES
Bulletin, TG newsletters, and electronic and other media.
-
Receiving requests for participation in the form of position or participation
statements.
-
Selecting and inviting participants.
-
Distributing statements to all participants in advance. The statements provide
participants with background and a chance to interact before the event.
-
Developing an agenda in advance of the event and outlining planned colloquium
activities and their duration.
-
Providing a mailing list of any nonmember presenters to HFES headquarters by
July 15, 2005, to ensure that they receive registration information.
-
Planning for dissemination of the results of the colloquium - for example, by
publication in HFES technical group newsletters, Ergonomics in Design, or other
HFES or non-HFES publications, or through other means.
To be scheduled as part of the annual meeting technical program, colloquia
should be open to all attendees. Limited- or closed-attendance colloquia will
be considered as affiliated activities with the annual meeting on a
space-available basis. Acceptance of colloquium proposals is based on an
evaluation of the relevance of the theme to the field, the potential for
generating useful results, and the organizer's ability to provide effective
leadership.
Presentation length: Colloquia meet for a half day or full day.
Proceedings paper: None.
Materials to submit: 150-word abstract and additional details as
requested in this linked document
(summary, date/time requested, etc.).
Where to submit: Special Sessions.
Presentation format: ALTERNATIVE FORMAT
Description: As the name suggests, the alternative format
category is intended primarily for proposals that do not fall under or are not
suited for the other presentation formats. Examples of alternative format
presentations include (but are not limited to) on-site experiments,
simulations, and other innovative approaches to present topics that would be of
interest to human factors/ergonomics professionals. The "Your 99 Seconds of
Fame" session at the 2004 Annual Meeting, in which speakers were given 99
seconds to summarize their work, is an excellent example of an alternative
format presentation that is both creative and informative.
Presentation length: 90-minute session
Proceedings paper: None
Materials to submit: 150-word abstract and 2000-word summary of
objectives, subject matter, presentation format, and expected benefits to
attendees
Where to submit: Special Sessions
Presentation format: TUTORIAL
Description: Tutorials differ from demonstrations in that they
are intended to provide both professional development opportunities for
experienced professionals as well as "how-to" advice for those new to the
profession. Tutorials should emphasize practical skills that are often learned
on the job because these skills either fall outside the scope of traditional
education in the field or are more specific than would be covered in a typical
graduate course. Presenters considering this format can generate appropriate
topics for tutorials by asking the question, "What did I have to learn the hard
way?" For example, possible topics include how to win government contracts or
grants, how to specify a display, or how to write a user interface
specification. Tutorials allow human factors/ergonomics professionals with a
unique opportunity to share their experience with fellow attendees and
enhancing the annual meeting technical program.
Presentation length: Tutorials are allotted up to 90 minutes for
the session, including time for questions and answers.
Proceedings paper: Presenters of accepted tutorials may publish a
proceedings paper of up to five pages.
Materials to submit: 150-word abstract and 2000-word summary
Where to submit: General Sessions
Presentation format: WORKSHOP
Description: Workshops differ from tutorials in that they are
more formal, structured sessions emphasizing hands-on, how-to learning
activities and are designed to provide participants with usable applied skills.
Workshops also require a registration fee and are scheduled for either half-day
or full-day sessions. Workshop proposals may cover technical skills such as
advanced statistical techniques (e.g., causal modeling), methodologies (e.g.,
accident investigation techniques, design of dynamic measuring instruments,
experimental design, interviewing techniques), or other professional skills
(e.g., how to write procedures based on human factors guidelines, types of
corporate-feasible usability testing, World Wide Web style sheet design).
Potential workshop participants include individuals new to the human factors
profession, individuals who are experienced in one area of human factors but
who wish to learn new skills in other areas, and, those who wish to enhance
their skills in their area of specialization. Because a single workshop cannot
address all of these audiences, proposals should articulate the level of
knowledge, skills, and experience a participant should have (e.g., novice,
experienced), as well as the knowledge, skills, and/or experience he or she
will acquire as a result of participating in the workshop. The workshop
organizer is responsible for submitting the proposal and for coordinating with
any additional instructors.
North Carolina State University will provide Continuing Education Units for
attendees who request them (a form will be provided with handout materials);
0.3 CEU is granted for half-day and 0.6 for full-day workshops. Final
acceptance of the workshop is contingent on the receipt of suitable course
materials by the due date (to be included in the tentative acceptance letter).
Furthermore, even after acceptance, workshops are subject to cancellation if
underenrolled one month prior to the start of the meeting (August 26, 2005).
Presentation length: All workshops are scheduled for Monday,
September 26. Workshops may be presented in one three-hour session in the
morning or afternoon or in two three-hour sessions, one in the morning and one
in the afternoon. An honorarium of $500 will be granted to the organizers of
each three-hour session and $1000 to organizers of each six-hour session.
Proceedings paper: None
Materials to submit: 150-word abstract and additional details as
requested in this linked document
(summary, presenter bios, date/time requested, etc.).
Where to submit: Workshops
Under the auspices of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society are 22 technical
groups that are concerned with the human factors aspects of specific
application areas. These TGs oversee the technical review of proposals in their
respective areas, described below.
The AEROSPACE SYSTEMS group is concerned with the application of human factors
to the development, design, certification, operation, and maintenance of
human-machine systems in aviation and space environments. The group addresses
issues for civilian and military systems in the realms of performance and
safety.
The technical group on AGING is concerned with human factors appropriate to
meeting the emerging needs of older people and special populations in a wide
variety of life settings.
The COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING TECHNICAL GROUP encourages
research on human cognition and decision making and the application of this
knowledge to the design of systems and training programs. Emphasis is on
considerations of descriptive models, processes, and characteristics of human
decision making, alone or in conjunction with other individuals or intelligent
systems; factors that affect decision making and cognition in naturalistic task
settings; technologies for assisting, modifying, or supplementing human
decision making; and training strategies for assisting or influencing decision
making.
The COMMUNICATIONS TECHNICAL GROUP is concerned with all aspects of
human-to-human communication, with special emphasis on communication mediated
by technology. Includes telephone services, multimedia communications (e.g.,
Internet services, Internet telephony, interactive TV, desktop
videoconferencing, collaborative communications, and multimedia information
services). Includes the design and evaluation of user interfaces of products,
systems, and services; enabling technologies such as speech and pen input,
telephone, and TV input devices; and infrastructure technologies such as
operations software, product documentation, and training.
The COMPUTER SYSTEMS TECHNICAL GROUP is concerned with human factors in the
design of computer systems. This includes the user-centered design of hardware,
software, applications, documentation, work activities, and the work
environment. Practitioners and researchers in the CSTG community take a
holistic, systems approach to the design and evaluation of all aspects of
user-computer interactions. Some goals are to ensure that computer systems are
useful, usable, safe, and, where possible, fun; and to enhance the quality of
work life and recreational/educational computer use by ensuring that computer
interface, function, and job design are interesting and provide opportunities
for personal and professional growth.
The EDUCATION TECHNICAL GROUP is concerned with the design of educational
systems, environments, interfaces, and technologies and with human factors
education. It consists of people who are interested in educational human
factors and ergonomics, directed at improving educational design and addressing
the educational needs of those seeking to increase their knowledge and skills
in the HF/E field.
The ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN TECHNICAL GROUP is concerned with the relationship
between human behavior and the designed environment. Common areas of research
and interest include ergonomic and macroergonomic aspects of design within
home, office, and industrial settings. An overall objective of this group is to
foster and encourage the integration of ergonomics principles into the design
of environments.
The FORENSICS PROFESSIONAL GROUP is concerned with the application of human
factors knowledge and techniques to "standards of care" and accountability
established within the legislative, regulatory, and judicial systems. The
emphasis is on providing a scientific basis to human factors/ergonomics issues
raised within these systems.
The HEALTH CARE TECHNICAL GROUP (formerly the Medical Systems and
Rehabilitation TG) is interested in maximizing the contributions of human
factors and ergonomics to medical systems effectiveness and the quality of life
for people who are functionally impaired.
The HUMAN PERFORMANCE MODELING TECHNICAL GROUP focuses on the development and
application of predictive, reliable, and executable quantitative models of
human performance. It considers the human, engaged in some goal-directed
behavior, in the context of a specific task environment
The INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN PERFORMANCE TECHNICAL GROUP serves those who
share an interest in any of the wide range of personality and individual
difference variables that are believed to mediate performance.
The INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS TECHNICAL GROUP is concerned with the application of
ergonomics data and principles for improving safety, productivity, and quality
of work in industry. It concentrates on service and manufacturing processes,
operations, and environments, including the design of products that form the
basis of industrial employment.
The INTERNET TECHNICAL GROUP seeks to create a community for professionals from
industry, academia, and government who share a common interest in Internet
technologies and related behavioral phenomena. Areas of interest include user
interface design of Web content, Web-based applications, Web browsers, Webtops,
Web-based user assistance, and Internet devices; behavioral and sociological
phenomena associated with distributed network communication; human reliability
in administration and maintenance of data networks; and accessibility of
Web-based products.
The MACROERGONOMICS TECHNICAL GROUP (formerly the Organizational Design and
Management TG) focuses on organizational design and management issues in human
factors and ergonomics as well as work system design and human-organization
interface technology. The TG is committed to improving work system performance
(e.g., productivity, quality, health and safety, quality of work life) by
promoting work system analysis and design practice and the supporting empirical
science concerned with the technological subsystem, personnel subsystem,
external environment, organizational design, and their interactions.
The PERCEPTION & PERFORMANCE TECHNICAL GROUP (formerly the Visual
Performance TG) consists of individuals interested in the relationship between
perception and human performance. Areas of concern include the nature, content,
and quantification of visual information and the context in which it is
displayed; the physics and psychophysics of information display; perceptual and
cognitive representation and interpretation of displayed information;
assessment of workload using visual tasks; and actions and behaviors that are
consequences of visually displayed information.
The PRODUCT DESIGN TECHNICAL GROUP (formerly the Consumer Products TG) is
dedicated to developing consumer products that are useful, usable, safe, and
desirable. By applying the principles and methods of human factors, consumer
research, and industrial design, the group works to ensure the success of
products sold in the marketplace.
The SAFETY TECHNICAL GROUP is concerned with the development and application of
human factors technology as it relates to safety in all settings and attendant
populations. These include, but are not limited to, aviation, transportation,
industry, military, office, public building, recreation, and home environments.
The SURFACE TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL GROUP provides a forum for individuals
involved or interested in human factors to exchange information, methodologies,
and ideas related to the international surface transportation field. Surface
transportation encompasses numerous mechanisms for conveying humans and
resources: passenger, commercial, and military vehicles, on- and off-road; mass
transit; maritime transportation; rail transit, including Vessel Traffic
Services (VTS); pedestrian and bicycle traffic; and highway and infrastructure
systems, including Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS).
The SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL GROUP offers a forum for fostering research and
exchanging information with respect to the integration of human factors and
ergonomics into the development of systems. Members are concerned with defining
human factors/ergonomics activities and integrating them into the system
development process in order to provide systems that meet user requirements.
Specific items of interest include the system development process itself;
developing tools and methods, notably modeling and simulation; case studies;
and such critical issues as reduced staffing for complex systems, the impact of
increasing computerization, and stress and workload effects on performance.
The TEST AND EVALUATION TECHNICAL GROUP consists of people interested in all
aspects of human factors and ergonomics as applied to the evaluation of
systems. Evaluation is a core skill for all human factors professionals and
includes measuring performance, workload, situational awareness, safety, and
acceptance of personnel engaged in operating and maintaining systems.
Evaluation is conducted during system development when prototype equipment and
systems are being introduced to operational usage and at intervals thereafter
during the operational life of these systems.
The TRAINING TECHNICAL GROUP provides a mechanism for information and
interchange among people interested in training and training research.
The VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS TECHNICAL GROUP is concerned with human factors issues
associated with human/virtual environment interaction. These issues include
maximizing human performance efficiency in virtual environments, ensuring
health and safety, and circumventing potential social problems through
proactive assessment. For VE/VR systems to be effective and well received by
their users, researchers need to focus significant efforts on addressing human
factors issues.
Do not send proposals directly to the Program Chairs listed below. All
submissions must be uploaded to the
HFES 2005 Submission site. See Step-by-Step Instructions.
In the on-line submission system, when you select one of the following
technical areas in the pull-down menu, your proposal is automatically directed
to the chair of that area.
If you are not sure which category fits the subject matter in your proposal,
contact the program chair(s) in the categories that best represent your topic.
If none is suitable, submit the proposal to General Sessions.
Seeking Proposal Reviewers
If you are willing to serve as a proposal reviewer, please contact the program
chair for the Technical Group(s) that fits your area(s) of expertise.
Technical Program Committee
Barrett Caldwell, Chair
Purdue University
School of Industrial Engineering
1287 Grissom Hall, Rm. 228D
West Lafayette, IN 47907-1287
765/494-5412
Fax 765/494-1299
mailto:bscaldwell@purdue.edu
General Sessions
Cheryl A. Bolstad
76 Lillian Ct.
Forest Hill, MD 21050-3271
410/638-6447
cheryl@satechnologies.com
Special Sessions
Ronald Laurids Boring
INEEL
P.O. Box 1625
Idaho Falls, ID 83415-3605
208/526-0966
Fax 208/526-2777
borirl@inel.gov
Student Forum
Geb Thomas
University of Iowa
Dept. of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering
2404 Seamans Ctr.
Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
319/335-5936
gthomas@icaen.uiowa.edu
Workshops
Michelle L. Rogers
VA GAPS Center
3200 Vine St., MC-111
Cincinnati, OH 45220
513/861-3100 x5543
Fax 513/487-6691
michelle.rogers@med.va.gov
2005 TECHNICAL GROUP PROGRAM CHAIRS
Aerospace Systems
Frank Durso
Texas Tech University
Psychology Department
Lubbock, TX 79409-2051
806/742-3711 x 259
frank.durso@ttu.edu
Aging
Christopher Mayhorn
North Carolina State University
Dept. of Psychology
640 Poe Hall
Raleigh, NC 27695
919/515-2251
cmayhorn@hotmail.com
Cognitive Engineering & Decision Making
David B. Kaber
Department of Industrial Engineering
North Carolina State University
2401 Stinson Dr.
328 Riddick Labs
Raleigh, NC 27695-7906
919/515-3086
dbkaber@unity.ncsu.edu
Communications
Benjamin Knott
8365 Liberty Walk Dr.
Round Rock, TX 78681-3880
(512) 388-2292
ben_knott@labs.sbc.com
Computer Systems
Joseph H. Goldberg
Oracle Corporation
500 Oracle Parkway, MS 2op2
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
650/607-6020
joe.goldberg@oracle.com
Consumer Products (see Product Design below)
Education
Ram R. Bishu
University of Nebraska
175 Nebraska Hall, IMSE Dept.
Lincoln, NE 68588-0518
402/472-2393
Fax 402/472-2410
rbishu@engunx.unl.edu
Environmental Design
ConneMara Bazley
5966 County Road 109
Carbondale, CO 81623
970/704-0773
Cell 970/618-5895
cbazley@bazley.net
Forensics Professional
Jay G. Pollack
14241 Fawndale Dr.
Sidney, OH 45365
937/681-0740
pollack@erinet.com
Health Care (formerly Medical Systems & Rehabilitation)
Caroline G. L. Cao
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
Tufts University
Medford, MA 02155
617/627-3239
Fax 617/627-3058
caroline.cao@tufts.edu
Human Performance Modeling
Robert Feyen
Purdue University
School of Industrial Engineering
315 N Grant St.
West Lafayette, IN 47906
765/494-5419
Fax 765/496-1809
rfeyen@purdue.edu
Individual Differences in Performance
Haydee M. Cuevas
2825 Carlisle Ave.
Orlando, FL 32826
407/737-8909
haydee.cuevas@satechnologies.com
Industrial Ergonomics
Sean Gallagher
NIOSH
PO Box 18070, Cochrans Mill Rd.
Pittsburgh, PA 15236
412/386-6445
Fax 412/386-5108
sfg9@cdc.gov
Internet
Marc L. Resnick
Industrial Engineering
Florida International University
University Park
Miami, FL 33199
305/348-3537
Fax 305/348-3721
resnickm@fiu.edu
Macroergonomics
Michelle M. Robertson
Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety
71 Frankland Rd.
Hopkinton, MA 01748
508/497-0248
michelle.robertson@libertymutual.com
Medical Systems and Rehabilitation (see Health Care above)
Perception & Performance
Harvey Smallman
Pacific Science & Engineering Group, Inc.
9180 Brown Deer Rd.
San Diego, CA 92121
858/535-1661
smallman@pacific-science.com
Product Design (formerly Consumer Products)
Jay G. Pollack (Interim)
14241 Fawndale Dr.
Sidney, OH 45365
937/681-0740
pollack@erinet.com
Safety
Steve Arndt
Exponent Failure Analysis Associates, Inc.
1800 Diagonal Rd., #355
Alexandria, VA 22314-2840
571/431-7210
sarndt@exponent.com
Surface Transportation
Tina Sayer
4700 Warren Rd.
Ann Arbor, MI 48105
734/668-4038
tsayer@visteon.com
System Development
James Pratt
P.O. Box 200895
Austin, TX 78720
512/257-4210
jpratt@soe.sony.com
Test and Evaluation
Larry Hettinger
57 Myrick Ln.
Harvard, MA 01451
978/772-0158
lhettinger@yahoo.com
Training
Stephen M. Fiore
Team Performance Lab
University of Central Florida
3100 Technology Parkway, Suite 100
Orlando, FL 32826-3271
407/882-0298
sfiore@ucf.edu
Virtual Environments
Ronald R. Mourant
Northeastern University
334 Snell Engin. Ctr., 360 Huntington Ave.
Boston, MA 02115-5000
617/373-3931
mourant@coe.neu.edu
Technical Program Committee
Chair
Barrett Caldwell
Workshops
Michelle L. Rogers
COTG Liaison
Ben-Tzion Karsh
Special Sessions
Ronald Laurids Boring
Student Forum
Geb W. Thomas
General Sessions
Cheryl A. Bolstad
Posters
Haydee M. Cuevas
Quality
Marc L. Resnick
Education & Training Committee Liaison
Mark D. Lee
At Large
ConneMara Bazley
Mark D. Lee
|